Search and AI visibility audit

internationaldisabilityalliance.orgSearch and AI visibility audit, update

Nick Gray

Audit by Nick Gray and team

nick@nickgray.net, +1 917 635 9967

You fixed the right things first. One big job is still open.

Since the first audit, your team fixed the sitemap, added structured data about IDA to every page, gave every page its own title and wrote real descriptions for every resource. Those fixes already show. IDA's score for AI answers went up from 58 to 63, and real visitors now get a fast site.

The open job is the old website. Search engines and archives know 7,809 old IDA addresses, and 397 of the 400 we checked now show "Not Found". Years of links, including links from Wikipedia, still point to them. This page shows what you fixed, how to bring that value back, the next ten steps, and the larger work we can do for you.

Your scores today

We use two separate scores. One measures how ready the site is to be quoted in AI answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews. The other measures classic search health. A third number stands alone, because it is the biggest problem on this page.

AI answers

Same method as the first audit, run again on 23 September

63 out of 100

Was 58 on 15 September. Up 5 points. The magenta segment is the gain.

Today, by category

  • Technical78
  • Content74
  • Platform readiness61
  • AI citability58
  • Schema55
  • Brand authority51

The gain came from the structured data, the sitemap and the single homepage heading. Brand authority did not move, because Wikipedia, Wikidata and Reddit have not changed.

Search health

First time measured, seven weighted categories

56 out of 100

A solid base with clear gaps.

  • Performance71 · weight 10%

    Real-visitor speed is good and improving. Mobile lab scores are middling.

  • Technical66 · weight 22%

    Sitemap and robots.txt fixed. No canonical tags, 7,809 old URLs show "Not Found", one broken breadcrumb link.

  • On-page62 · weight 20%

    Every title is unique now. 12 pages lack a description, /impact is untouched, 35 titles end in a stray period.

  • AI readiness60 · weight 10%

    All major AI crawlers are allowed. Few passages are ready to quote.

  • Images47 · weight 5%

    14 of 15 people in the impact-story photos have no alt text. The homepage hero image loads late.

  • Content42 · weight 23%

    Strong real stories. Headline numbers have no source, no bylines, resources are short teasers for PDFs, 4 known errors are still live.

  • Schema38 · weight 10%

    Up from 5. Organization data on every page. No news, event, person or breadcrumb data yet, and the resource data fails validation.

Magenta marks a category under 50.

4 / 100

Link equity preservedThe value of the links that point at the old site's 7,809 addresses. None of those addresses redirect to the new site, so almost none of that value reaches it. See priority one.

What you fixed

The first six items below were on the first audit's list. Each was the right fix, and several are already paying off. The last two are good news we measured this time.

The IDA homepage on 23 September. One clear main heading now, where there were two.
The IDA homepage on a phone
Nick's note

Good technical SEO is what AI tools use to find and trust a website. These fixes were the right place to start.

  1. The XML sitemap is live

    The sitemap lists 52 pages and robots.txt points to it. Search engines and AI crawlers now get a complete list of your pages.

    Before: no sitemap at all.
  2. Structured data about IDA is on every page, 52 of 52

    This is a small block of code that tells Google and AI tools who IDA is. It links to IDA's Wikipedia article and Wikidata entry (Q6050174), with the founding year and both offices. This single change moved AI platform readiness the most: ChatGPT readiness went from 58 to 73, and Gemini from 42 to 63.

    Before: none.
  3. Every page has its own title

    Google and AI tools can now tell your pages apart in results.

    Before: 22 of 40 pages were titled just "IDA".
  4. Resource pages have their own accurate descriptions, 21 of 21

    Each resource now describes itself in search results.

    Before: one copy-pasted CRPD sentence on all of them.
  5. The homepage has one main heading

    The homepage now tells search engines one clear thing about what IDA is.

    Before: two.
  6. The facts now agree

    The ASEAN member count is 10 everywhere on /our-network. The events listing now shows COSP19 in June, in New York.

    Before: 10 in one place and 11 in another. COSP19 was listed as August, Geneva.
  7. Real visitors get a fast site, and it keeps getting faster

    Largest Contentful Paint (how long the main content takes to appear) went from 2.9 seconds to 1.8 seconds over five weeks, measured on real Chrome visitors. Interaction speed is 68 ms and layout shift is 0.02. All three Core Web Vitals are good. See the speed chart.

  8. All major AI crawlers can read the site

    GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and the other major AI crawlers all get through. IDA's Domain Rating is 71, level with Humanity & Inclusion (72) and the World Federation of the Deaf (72).

Priority one

The old website's pages all lead to "Not Found"

Critical

The Wayback Machine holds 7,809 old IDA addresses from 2013 to 2026: 6,716 pages and 1,093 PDFs. We checked 400 of them live on 23 September, starting with the most visited. 397 show "Not Found". None redirect. The other 3 (/, /resources and /events) work only because the new site happens to use the same short address.

7,809old addresses known to the Wayback Machine
397/400checked live show "Not Found"
0redirects to the new site
52pages on the new site

Why it matters

IDA's Domain Rating of 71 was built by years of links to those old pages. Every one of those links now ends on a "Not Found" page, so that authority is not passed to the new site. Google still shows many of these dead addresses in its results today. AI tools that check a source hit the same dead end, and people who click give up.

Domain Rating, IDA and its neighbours

Ahrefs, 0 to 100. Higher means more and stronger links.

IDA's 71 was built while the old site's addresses were live. Redirects are how that strength reaches the new pages.

Proof from real places

The shape of the old site, next to the new one

Old addresses by type, from the Wayback Machine. Each group has a sample dead link.

2,563 of the old addresses were Spanish pages under /es/, spread across these groups. Most old pages will fold into one new page, because the new site is much smaller.

The 20 old addresses to fix first

Chosen for who still links to them and whether Google still shows them. Click any old address to see the "Not Found" page for yourself. The suggested new home is the closest page on today's site.

#Old address (shows "Not Found")Why it mattersSuggested new home
1/secretariatCited by IDA's Wikipedia article/our-team
2/ipc-idaCited by the WeThe15 Wikipedia article/new-releases
3/ida-anniversaryCited by the IDDC Wikipedia article/new-releases
4/CRPDStill in Google results for "CRPD"/resources
5/aboutStill in Google results/our-network
6/content/ida-board-and-secretariatStill in Google results/our-team
7/content/ida-membersStill in Google results for "IDA members"/our-network
8/content/legal-and-financialsStill in Google results/governance
9/generalassemblyStill in Google results/governance
10/UnderstandingtheCRPDHandbookStill in Google results, a long-lived resource/resources
11/COSPStill in Google results for "COSP"/events
12/content/crpd-committeeStill in Google results/resources
13/CRPD-advocacyStill in Google results/global-influence-and-research-center
14/content/historyStill in Google results/our-network
15/content/our-principlesStill in Google results/our-strategy
16/all-countriesStill in Google results/our-network
17/crpd-implementation-guidelinesStill in Google results/resources
18/content/associate-membersStill in Google results, and recent/our-network
19/sites/default/files/ida_articles_of_association.pdfA governance document others link to/governance
20/sites/default/files/ida_global_survey_complete_report_final.pdfStill in Google results/resources
Where this lives in Webflow

Site settings, then Publishing, then 301 redirects. Webflow supports bulk import and pattern rules. It still needs care:

  • Old addresses are case-sensitive in Webflow. /CRPD is not the same as /crpd.
  • Specific rules must come before pattern rules, or the pattern catches everything first.
  • Importing a file replaces all existing redirects, so the list has to be complete before it goes in.
We have the full list

We have the full list of 7,809 old URLs, with a suggested destination for each one. This is the first job we would do.

One question for IDA

The old site had 2,563 Spanish pages, such as /es/resources. The new site has none. Does IDA plan to bring Spanish back? The answer decides where those addresses should point.

Top 10 next steps

In order of value. Each card says who is best placed to do it.

IDA staff (minutes) Web team (a ticket) Our team (valuable work)
  1. Redirect the old URLs

    Send each of the 7,809 old addresses to the closest new page, so links from Wikipedia, Google and partner websites land somewhere useful again. See priority one.

    CriticalOur team (valuable work)
  2. Fix the broken link on three pages

    The breadcrumb on /governance, /our-network and /our-strategy points to /our-purpose-and-commitment, which shows "Not Found". It is one shared component, so one fix repairs all three pages.

    Web team (a ticket)
  3. Remove the stray period at the end of 35 page titles

    The CMS title templates end with "International Disability Alliance." and that full stop shows in every Google result for those pages. One edit per collection template fixes all 35.

    IDA staff (minutes)
  4. Give every release, resource and event a short, quotable summary

    35 CMS items today. A summary that states the facts in two or three sentences is what AI tools quote. See B below.

    Our team (valuable work)
  5. Add the missing structured data

    News data on the 7 releases, event data on the 7 events, person data for the team and board, and breadcrumb data on every page. Also fix the resource data, which uses an incomplete page address on all 21 resource pages and fails validation. See C below.

    Our team (valuable work)
  6. Link related pages to each other

    Two program pages, /alliance-and-opd-strengthening and /inclusive-solutions-center, have no links in their content at all. See D below.

    Our team (valuable work)
  7. Correct the stale facts in Wikipedia and Wikidata

    Wikipedia still names the previous Executive Director. We prepare the sourced request so an independent editor can make the change. See E below.

    Our team (valuable work)
  8. Bring /impact up to the standard of the rest of the site

    It still has two main headings ("IMPACT" and "Enabling Good Lives"), a 6-character title ("Impact") and a 19-character description. And 14 of the 15 people in its story photos have no alt text, so screen readers and AI tools cannot tell who is pictured.

    Web team (a ticket)IDA staff (minutes)
  9. Fix the four known content errors

    Nikola's story on /impact says Croatia in the heading and Serbia in the body. The privacy policy repeats "We may also collect information that you choose to provide, for example when you:" three times with no list after it, has joined words ("someactivities", "anapplication", "notresponsible"), and promises an update date it does not show. The COSP19 page says 8 June in one place and 9 June in another.

    IDA staff (minutes)
  10. Add a source line under the homepage numbers

    The homepage shows 430M lives impacted, +21K OPD-led interventions, +2,500 laws, +2,400 resources and 1.3 billion. None has a source or a year. AI tools and journalists repeat numbers they can check.

    IDA staff (minutes)

Valuable work to be done

Some of the most useful work left touches every CMS item, or thousands of old addresses, at once. In Webflow that is slow to do by hand, one item at a time. This is where we can help. Each item shows the count and one real example.

The redirect map

7,809 old addresses

A destination for every old address, checked against the new site, in the order Webflow needs. The top 20 are in priority one. This is the job that brings back the most value for the least change to the site.

Quotable summaries for AI answers

35 releases, resources and events

AI tools quote short passages that state facts plainly: who, what, where, when, and a number. Today no passage on the site reaches the "citation-ready" level. Every page we tested averages a C, D or F on the citability scale, and the /new-releases listing has no passage long enough to score at all.

The fix is a summary field on each release, resource and event. It shows under the headline, and it is reused as the page description and in the structured data. Here is one example, from the Tonga release:

Today's opening27 / 100
"The International Disability Alliance (IDA) warmly welcomes the Kingdom of Tonga's ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), a historic milestone for persons with disabilities in Tonga and throughout the Pacific."
Quotable summary61 / 100
"Tonga is a Pacific Kingdom that ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on 4 September 2026. The treaty enters into force for Tonga on 4 October 2026, one month after ratification. The International Disability Alliance (IDA) says the milestone follows years of advocacy by Tongan organisations of persons with disabilities, led by the Lavame'a Ta'e'iloa Disabled People Association (LATA) and the Pacific Disability Forum, with IDA President Dr Nawaf Kabbara calling it a new chapter for Tongatapu, Vava'u, Ha'apai, 'Eua and the Niuas."

Two more places where the facts are there but AI tools cannot use them:

  • The homepage paragraph about what IDA is has the right facts, but the numbers sit in separate counter widgets. AI tools cannot read them as one statement. One answer paragraph with the numbers inside it fixes that.
  • All 21 resource pages are short teasers in front of a PDF. AI tools that do not open PDFs never see IDA's best material. The COP30 climate briefing PDF names a climate finance goal of 300 billion dollars a year and five specific asks. The web page for that briefing mentions neither.

Structured data on every template

4 templates, plus 21 resource pages to correct

Structured data is how a page tells Google and AI tools what it is, in a form machines read without guessing. IDA now has it for the organisation. The next layer describes each page:

  • News data on releases, with the publish date and the spokesperson. It says "this is news from this date". Today the releases have no machine-readable publish date at all.
  • Event data on events, with dates and place. It says "this is an event on these dates at the UN in New York", as for COSP19.
  • Person data for about 29 team members and the board on /our-team and /governance. It says "this person leads IDA".
  • Breadcrumb data on every page, so search results show where a page sits on the site.
  • A correction on all 21 resource pages, whose page address in the data is incomplete and fails validation.

Wikipedia and Wikidata

1 article, 1 data entry

ChatGPT and Gemini lean on Wikipedia. Your website is now correct, but AI answers will keep repeating the old facts until Wikipedia changes.

FactWhat Wikipedia and AI answers sayWhat IDA's website says
Executive DirectorVladimir CukJosé María Viera, on /our-team
Size of the allianceAn AI answer today: "over 1,100 organisations… eight global and six regional networks", repeated from Wikipedia-era sources5,500 organisations, 14 networks, 182 countries, on /our-network
Last editedWikipedia: 14 December 2025. Wikidata Q6050174: 24 October 2025The site was last published on 23 September 2026
Wikidata detailsNo founding date, no headquarters, no director, no LinkedIn or YouTubeYour structured data already states the founding year and both offices
SpanishNo Spanish Wikipedia article existsNo Spanish pages on the new site
How this has to be done

IDA staff should not edit the Wikipedia article themselves. Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest rules treat that as a problem even when the facts are right. The correct route is a sourced edit request on the article's Talk page, with independent sources for each fact. We prepare that request. Wikidata can be updated directly.

How ready each AI platform is for IDA today

Readiness score out of 100, 23 September.

  • ChatGPT search73
  • Gemini63
  • Bing Copilot58
  • Google AI Overviews56
  • Perplexity53

Four of five platforms moved up sharply after the structured data and sitemap fixes. The Wikipedia work is the next big step for ChatGPT and Gemini.

An HTML sitemap page and an archive of the old site's content

52 pages today, years of old material

A simple page that lists every page on the site, grouped by topic, and an archive that keeps the best of the old site's content online. Years of material stay findable for search engines and AI tools, instead of 52 pages carrying the whole brand.

Nick's note

I promised Jarrod an HTML sitemap page and an archive for the old content. Both are in this plan.

Alt text and descriptions in bulk

14 portraits, 12 pages

Alt text for the 14 impact-story portraits on /impact. Only one of the 15 people pictured is described today. For a disability-rights organisation this is a credibility point as well as an accessibility one.

Descriptions for the 12 pages without one, most of them hub pages such as /resources, /events, /new-releases, /our-network and /governance. Without one, Google writes its own snippet for exactly the pages people click first.

We can do this work for IDA

Everything in A to G is work our team can take on, with your web team and staff approving each step. The redirect map is the first job, because every week of "Not Found" pages costs IDA links, search results and trust.

Write to Nick at nick@nickgray.net or call +1 917 635 9967.

Speed

Real visitors get a fast site, and it is getting faster. This is the measure Google uses.

How fast the main content appears for real visitors

Largest Contentful Paint, 75th percentile, Chrome UX Report, whole site. Each point is a 28-day window. The last five weeks are shaded.

1.5 s 2.0 s 2.5 s 3.0 s Good is under 2.5 s 2,916 ms on 22 Aug 1,810 ms on 19 Sep Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
1.8 sLargest Contentful Paint. Good.
68 msInteraction to Next Paint. Good.
0.02Cumulative Layout Shift. Good.
884 msServer response, just above the 800 ms good line.

Lab tests are slower, and that is normal

Google PageSpeed Insights also runs a lab test on a slow simulated phone. Those scores are middling, mainly because of animation code and Webflow's JavaScript files. Because real visitors already see good speed, this is a lower priority than everything above.

PageMobile scoreMobile LCP (lab)Desktop score
Homepage744.4 s83
/impact694.8 s98
A release: new UN guidelines on intersectional discrimination765.0 s100
/resources/annual-report-2025794.5 s99

The homepage takes 14.3 seconds in the lab before it responds to taps, and its hero image is set to load late although it is the first thing people see. Both are in everything else.

Everything else

Smaller items, medium and low priority. Open any one for the detail.

No canonical tags on any page Medium

0 of 52 pages have a canonical tag, the line that tells search engines which address is the official one for a page. Without it, versions with and without "www" or a trailing slash can compete with each other as the site grows.

The 2025-2030 strategy has no real web page Medium

/our-strategy is 165 words in front of a PDF. IDA's strategy for 2025 to 2030 deserves a real summary on the page, so search engines and AI tools can read and quote it.

No named author on releases Medium

Every release is signed "IDA Media". A named spokesperson, linked to their bio on /our-team or /governance, gives Google and AI tools a real person to trust.

The homepage hero image loads late Low

The large photo at the top of the homepage is set to "lazy" loading, which delays the first thing people see. Remove lazy loading on that one image. The homepage mobile lab score is 74, with a lab LCP of 4.4 s and 14.3 s before it responds to taps, caused by animation code and Webflow's JavaScript files. Real visitors see good speed, so this is a lower priority.

Social sharing tags are incomplete Low

The og:url and og:site_name tags are missing on all 52 pages. The twitter:image tag is missing on 17 pages, including the homepage, so some shares show no picture.

A placeholder page is in the sitemap Low

/coming-soon is listed in the sitemap, but no page links to it. Remove it from the sitemap.

No llms.txt file Low

/llms.txt shows "Not Found". This is an optional file that gives AI tools a short guide to a site. Google ignores it. It is cheap to add.

No favicon file at the standard address Low

/favicon.ico shows "Not Found". The icon tags on the pages exist, so browsers are fine. Some tools still look for this file.

Two AI crawlers are blocked Low

robots.txt blocks Amazonbot (Alexa) and YouBot (You.com). Their audiences are small for an NGO, so this is fine if it was a deliberate choice.

Only one security header is set Low

Only HSTS is set. The other standard security headers can be added at Cloudflare in one place.

The short address takes two redirects Low

http://internationaldisabilityalliance.org takes two redirects to reach the final address. One is enough.

Generic link wording Low

There are 40 generic "See all…" links and 23 "Download" links that do not name the document, for example on the resource pages. "Download the CRPD at 20 report (PDF)" tells people, screen readers and AI tools much more than "Download".

How we did this

We ran two independent audit methods on 23 September 2026. One is built for search engines: technical health, on-page, structured data, content, images and speed. The other is built for AI answers (GEO): citability, AI crawler access, brand and entity signals, and readiness for each AI platform. We checked all 52 pages in the sitemap. The AI answers score uses the same method as the first audit.

Sources

  • 7,809 old IDA addresses from the Wayback Machine, 400 of them checked live on 23 September.
  • Google PageSpeed Insights for lab tests, and the Chrome UX Report for real-visitor speed.
  • Ahrefs Domain Rating for IDA and six comparable organisations.
  • Live Google searches for IDA's name, leadership, members and core topics.
  • IDA's Wikipedia article and Wikidata entry.

How the search health score is built

CategoryWeightScore
Content23%42
Technical22%66
On-page20%62
Schema10%38
Performance10%71
AI readiness10%60
Images5%47
Weighted total100%56

What we could not see

We did not have access to IDA's Google Search Console, so index coverage and search traffic figures are not included.